Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Get Your Sexy Back


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. cleanup issues Fritzpoll (talk) 06:56, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Get Your Sexy Back

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article about an anti-drinking campaign in Singapore. This was previously speedied as making no assertion of notability but since the article makes several (sourced) claims of notability it should be discussed instead.Nick Boalch \ talk 08:42, 14 April 2009 (UTC) Get Your Sexy Back (GYSB) is Singapore's first youth-led community initiative by Asia Pacific Breweries Singapore and it is actually a national moderate drinking campaign that has received significant amount of media coverage - print, online and broadcast. More recently, GYSB has extensively reached out to the audience through a mini-concert held at The Heeren and collaborations with acclaimed local band 大风吹 (Da Feng Chui), runners-up of Superband 2008 - who created the new GYSB theme song in Mandarin. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.186.9.229 (talk) 16:05, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Not sure. The programme doesn't seem to be the subject of significant coverage in the media (per WP:ORG), but does seem to be a non-trivial campaign with a national scope in Singapore, covered by several independent sources. --Nick Boalch \ talk 09:07, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions.  -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  14:58, 14 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep - The "further reading" section now shows much coverage to establish notability. --Omarcheeseboro (talk) 16:22, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep this sourced but rather puffery article. Needs a good cleanup and does read rather as an advertisement.  Springnuts (talk) 17:05, 14 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.