Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Get Zephyr (Test Management System)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JForget 01:31, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Get Zephyr (Test Management System)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Fixed malformed nomination for. His statement in the edit summary was: "getzephyr, a small company, does not follow notability guidelines". No opinion from me. cab (talk) 09:01, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete although the paid editor is doing it for cash, the article reads like spam to me. Rohedin  TALK 16:23, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - spam. Wikipedia is not a business directory. Jusdafax  17:08, 7 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete It doesn't read as spam to me (although the intention behind the placing of the article is possibly another matter...). I do fail to see the notability of the outfit being established. I am not quite sure what their product is actually supposed to do (even after reading the article four times), but wonder what the point is if MS Excel is a competitor. Maybe it is to save you the trouble of setting up a spreadsheet. Only one of the references seems to be from a reliable source (assuming the SD Times is such), and that reads like a press release rather than an independent review. I do wish Zephyr luck, but feel more needs to be done before their article finds a home here. Peridon (talk) 20:13, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:49, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:50, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: Original poster — Testmanagementwiki (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.    7  07:47, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.