Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Get schwifty


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted by (procedural close). (non-admin closure) — Nizolan  (talk) 22:51, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Get schwifty

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Vandalism. See entry creation. KnowledgeBattle | TalkPage | GodlessInfidel ┌┬╫┴┼╤╪╬╜ 02:11, 6 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Closure comment - I closed as Delete assuming it would be deleted ....however... it's still up so I've reverted the close, I don't see the point in keeping the AFD open unnecessary but whatever reverted. – Davey 2010 Talk 03:27, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete. The article is still there with an A7 tag, but I'm willing to see that ride out., I'm gonna revert the removal of the template since the article is not yet gone for procedural reasons. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 05:43, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
 * - Sorry I'd forgotten to readd the tag, Thanks for readding it back for me :) – Davey 2010 Talk 14:26, 6 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete - but want to point out to that those words were not vandalism in the original creation. Those are lyrics to a song from an episode of Rick and Morty. Completely not notable by itself and should be deleted, but not vandalism. For transparency, I was the one who changed the delete to csd-a7 if that matters for my !vote at all.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) Please &#123;&#123;re&#125;&#125; 06:04, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Okay, thanks. When I saw the page (which you say are lyrics), I was under the impression that it was a bunch of gibberish, posted by the author. It's been a long time since I've read anything so stupid.
 * KnowledgeBattle | TalkPage | GodlessInfidel ┌┬╫┴┼╤╪╬╜ 08:39, 6 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Speedied. I've speedied it as a non-notable song and a non-notable phrase. Bishonen &#124; talk 21:18, 6 April 2016 (UTC).
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:13, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:13, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:13, 6 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.