Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Getik Baghdasarian


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Now the award has been shown,no point in prolonging this  DGG ( talk ) 17:08, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Getik Baghdasarian

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Fails WP:NOTE. Lack of significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Cirt (talk) 20:10, 20 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:17, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 05:06, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep: There are 4 English and 1 Armenian sources in External links. --  Ashot  ( talk ) 00:30, 23 February 2010 (UTC) — Ashot Arzumanyan (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Actually the editor has made substantial edits to a number of articles outside this topic (editor was formerly . --  Ty  18:11, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
 * I suggest you use these external links as references, provided they meet WP:RS. See WP:REFB. Also, can you provide references for museum collections, as this would weigh heavily in the article's favour.  Ty  18:16, 28 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Armenia-related deletion discussions.  — Ty  11:54, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:ANYBIO: "the person has received a notable award or honor". Baghdasarian was the winner of the 2006 presidential award for sculpture. Other material in the article also attests to notability.  Ty  12:14, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.