Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gevalum


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Wickethewok 16:02, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Gevalum
Non-notable online game; fails WP:WEB Percy Snoodle 09:02, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. 139 Ghits.--Jusjih 10:37, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. MER-C 12:05, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, more relevant external links added per WP:WEB specifications (Through related online news sources, information databases). 130.108.222.40 15:14, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I'm not sure I see the relevance of all those links, nor how they help to establish Gevalum's notablility. Percy Snoodle 15:47, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, The info on links is relevant 81.8.201.97 17:59, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment but how does it establish the game's notablility? Percy Snoodle 09:44, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I fail to see the relevence of this article. It describes a game that is not even of note, and it reads like an advertisement.24.36.202.52 01:21, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Disagree, 24.36.202.52, reads like any informational article... also, as listed, game is of note, as shown by three notable online sources 130.108.222.40 02:50, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment this user has already voted "Keep" above. Percy Snoodle 09:44, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. -- moe .RON   talk  16:55, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong, Speedy Delete - Listing a game in a database is not establishment of notability. The Kinslayer 09:49, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - The links are pure spam. Links to other online games, links to official sites, links to an MSN group for crying out loud! The Kinslayer 17:53, 23 October 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.