Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gfxartist


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:08, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Gfxartist

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Appears to fail the notability criteria due to a lack of significant impact than can be demonstrated in independent sources. Searching Google News reveals no articles, general searching shows mentions on internet guides (web and book based) but nothing to firmly demonstrate notability worthy of creating an encyclopaedic article and current references included are all back to the website. The article has had a six year grace period for reliable sources to be found and added. Fæ (talk) 13:01, 13 August 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  -- Fæ (talk) 13:02, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  -- Fæ (talk) 13:03, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions.  -- Fæ (talk) 22:05, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,   A rbitrarily 0    ( talk ) 16:42, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete per WP:WEB. That the article has been around since 2004 and still has no sources suggests there simply aren't any sources to be found. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  16:56, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.