Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gfxvoid (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. The Land 17:59, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

Gfxvoid
This was previously speedy deleted whilst on AfD at Articles for deletion/Gfxvoid, but WP:DRV decided to reverse that as an out-of-process speedy and send it back here. I've opened this new debate rahter than re-opening the old since it's been several days. Don't speedy this one, huh? -Splash talk 00:28, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Not all "communities" can be notable enough for a Wiki article...I'm pretty sure this one isn't. --Bugturd 00:39, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. Seems like borderline on notability (at least by my standards), but reads like an ad and has no significant content.--ragesoss 02:10, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Any objections to ping-ing the previous participants? - brenneman (t) (c)  02:39, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Only 120 or so unique google hits and an alexa rank of 331,849  -- Astrokey44 |talk 04:24, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Basically the same stiry as Smokey's, above. -R. fiend 04:27, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. It wasn't notable enough the first time, and it's not notable enough now. J I P  | Talk 09:38, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable community. --Ter e nce Ong (恭喜发财) 13:54, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, no convincing evidence of notability has yet been presented. Dpbsmith (talk) 16:58, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, why is DRV dumping this crud back at us? --Agamemnon2 07:56, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Because the article did not meet any speedy criteria. Sjakkalle (Check!)  14:31, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - not notable enough. Latinus 23:01, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. I feel privileged to vote for things twice. Though I didn't vote on this the first time around. But you get my drift. RasputinAXP  talk contribs 23:47, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:WEB criteria. Sjakkalle (Check!)  14:31, 2 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.