Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GhSMART & Company


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Uncontested; see WP:SOFTDELETE. –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 02:05, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

GhSMART & Company

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (companies) requirement. The sources are the usuall wP:CORPSPAM mentions in passing and primary. 4 pages Case Study used and sold by some Harvard courses doesn't impress me terribly, as it does not seem peer reviewed, but more like a form of academic self-publishing. Before someone points out to, note that this is written by the company's employees. Bottom line, I don't think that being a subject of a non-peer reviewed for-profit Harvard case study makes this company notable, and I don't see any better sources. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 13:02, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   14:31, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   14:31, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  J 947 (c)  00:24, 17 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.