Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghana–Jamaica relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) T ofutwitch11  (T ALK ) 22:59, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Ghana–Jamaica relations

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Dicdef. Disputed prod. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:17, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:33, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:33, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:34, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

*delete no significant coverage of topic. LibStar (talk) 19:52, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - currently indeed a pointless definition of a stub, but a non-notable contrived topic based on combinatorial logic and nothing else. Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:30, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
 * keep enough sources found below. LibStar (talk) 20:28, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep significant cultural and governmental contacts. For example,, , , , to list a few.--TM 20:12, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
 * most of these are good sources but globalfusion seems a blog and not so reliable. However, there's enough to change my vote. LibStar (talk) 20:28, 12 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep - added refs on history to article. In ictu oculi (talk) 03:45, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep Stub satisfies GNG now. --99of9 (talk) 01:39, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep Has enough refs to be notable. Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 19:06, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep Despite our recent differences, In ictu oculi has done some great work on it. Although a stub, it's clear there is a noteworthy international relationship there that meets Wikipedia's inclusion guidelines. Mkdw talk
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.