Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghanem Ibrahim al-Hassan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. —Tom Morris (talk) 15:57, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Ghanem Ibrahim al-Hassan

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not notable enough, only notable event about him is his assassination FavorLaw (talk) 12:15, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Deletion proposed per http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:CRIME#CRIM  and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:BLP1E#Subjects_notable_only_for_one_event --FavorLaw (talk) 12:52, 21 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - Non-notable death, as per WP:1E. Being an active member of the military means you run the risk of being injured and killed as part of your job, unfortunately. Sionk (talk) 13:23, 21 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep - Notable as he is the first high ranking death amongst the Syrian Army, during the uprising.Goltak (talk) 16:38, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Being the "first high ranking death" does not confer notablity. See below though. - The Bushranger One ping only 03:22, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Syria-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:18, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:18, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:19, 23 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep - WP:1E doesn't apply here, as al-Hassan isn't notable for one event (the getting killed thing). He's also notable because he was a brigadier general - those with stars on their shoulders are considered to be generally notable per WP:SOLDIER and long-standing practice. The news created by the event helps to meet sourcing to confirm that notability, but as a general officer, an article about him is proper. - The Bushranger One ping only 03:22, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep, per WP:SOLDIER. A flag/general officer is considered generally notable, regardless of his death. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 22:34, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep we have FAR TOO FEW articles on non-Western one-stars to even *consider* deleting this. Buckshot06 (talk) 23:20, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. General officers are usually considered notable per WP:SOLDIER (yes, I know it's not a formal guideline!) and common sense. -- Necrothesp (talk) 23:44, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.