Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghani Automobile Industries


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The argument that the company ''is WP:LISTED. Therefore, keep'' is a misreading of WP:LISTED. The sources cited were potentially useful to establish WP:N, but nobody agreed. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:53, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Ghani Automobile Industries

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A local company with no notability.  Greenbörg  (talk)  16:21, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2017 May 11.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 16:39, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   16:48, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   16:48, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete I cannot find adequate sources. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG. -- HighKing ++ 17:04, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   11:31, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:06, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep - The company is WP:LISTED. Therefore, keep and improve. See: Express Tribune, Express Tribune & The Nation. - Mfarazbaig (talk) 08:53, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   07:24, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete -- self-cited & does not make a claim to notability. LISTED does not guarantee that a subject should have an article. No prejudice to recreation if can be done with appropriate RS. However, no value to the project at this time. K.e.coffman (talk) 20:12, 3 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.