Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gharaibeh


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:42, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Gharaibeh

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

this tribe is not notable enough in jordan and in Arab world. in addition it has no enough resources to prove notablity and it contains many controversial information without any resources. i think there's a bias in the article because both the creator and  who are a major contributors to the article of their tribe and that is clear from the page history مصعب (talk) 12:09, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Jordan-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:45, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:41, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
 * We at ar. wiki usually follow strict rules concerning tribes and clans in the Arab world, the only Google results about this tribe seems to be from forums and social media pages that are concerned with this tribe in particular and the northern area of Jordan in general. Thus it doesn't seem to be notable--باسم (talk) 12:38, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Needs references Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 22:56, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, clpo13(talk) 17:40, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I agree with the previous colleagues that this is a tribe (clan) like many other tribes, without any significant notability. Cheers, Amr ibn Kulthoumعمرو بن كلثوم (talk) 07:27, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Original work. --Helmoony (talk) 14:14, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 20:42, 1 February 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.