Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gharjistan University


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗ plicit  12:15, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Gharjistan University

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Reviewed under new page patrol. No content (barely a stub) and no wp:notability-suitable references. When looking at a reference given (their web page) establishing wp:notability via more sources looks unlikely. Article was previously deleted. Curation tool didn't work on creating this page so I created manually. North8000 (talk) 14:26, 10 January 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  00:34, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 07:17, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Afghanistan-related deletion discussions.  ✗  plicit  00:35, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Hmm, so are there indications that this is a legitimate academic institution? Per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES #2, it's likely to be notable if so. &#123;{u&#124; Sdkb  }&#125;  talk 01:48, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Well I think the bar is a bit higher than just legitimate. The only English page on their web site has a "trying to get established" look. Maybe the fact that it is in Afghanistan gives it more notability. I'm not advocating any particular outcome on this; just doing my NPP job. North8000 (talk) 15:17, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES #2. Appears to be a legitimate institution of higher learning per Boston University, the Times of Israel, Gulf News, and at least one online journal. That appears to be enough to satisfy both that outcome and WP:NSCHOOL. Eggishorn  (talk) (contrib) 21:46, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep per . It's sad that there's so little coverage of this institution (at least readily accessible in English), but it appears legitimate. &#123;{u&#124; Sdkb  }&#125;  talk 21:59, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Neutral As I discussed above.North8000 (talk) 01:08, 31 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.