Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghazala Gardens hotel

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus. The votes are: 7 to keep, 7 to redirect, 1 to delete or redirect, 3 to delete (including the nominator) -- BD2412 talk 02:49, August 5, 2005 (UTC)

Ghazala Gardens hotel
Unless they have played a significant role in human affairs, hotels are not inherently notable. Denni &#9775; 02:37, 2005 July 23 (UTC)


 * Keep this hotel was a target of a major terrorist attack recently . --malathion talk 02:47, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand. Sasquatch&#08242;&#08596;T&#08596;C 02:49, July 23, 2005 (UTC)
 * After reading the below, I think would like to think a redirect makes more sense now. Sasquatch&#08242;&#08596;T&#08596;C 20:41, July 23, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Redirect, unless a significant amount of information about the hotel itself appears in the article before this VfD expires. Yes, it was the target of a terrorist attack, but so far, every notable piece of information about the hotel is already covered in that article. (Changed vote as per Ливай. 08:11, July 23, 2005 (UTC)) &mdash; HorsePunchKid &rarr; &#x9F9C; 02:52, July 23, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand. --Tony Hecht 03:32, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
 * I now think a redirect makes more sense. If at some future date something about the hotel earns it, it can get it's own entry.  --Tony Hecht 22:00, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete The hotel itself is not notable, only the events that took place. This should be covered under the article specific to the event as per HorsePunchKid.Hamster Sandwich 03:45, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect to July 23, 2005, Sharm el-Sheikh attacks. Later on, if somebody can write something encyclopedic about it not pertaining to those attacks, they can replace the redirect with something else, but for now there's nothing here that would not fit in better at July 23, 2005, Sharm el-Sheikh attacks with its proper context. — Ливай | Ⓣ 04:28, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete nn hotel. JamesBurns 05:07, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect per Livajo's recommendation.--DNicholls 07:21, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect as stated above. -- BMIComp (talk, HOWS MY DRIVING) 07:52, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete or Redirect. GhePeU 08:59, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand Seems a major establishment. Possibly notable. We've had worse beginning stubs before. Circeus 11:21, July 23, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand. The TWA Flight 800 and United Flight 93 articles started out as little more than stubs when they were first drafted.  WP will add to it as more news develops from the recent attacks.  LokiCT 12:22, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. per malathion--Edcolins 12:29, July 23, 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect, as above. -R. fiend 15:45, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep The hotel may have future history which will not be covered in the terrorism article. Calsicol 16:56, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Anything, could have a future history. -R. fiend 18:30, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep This is jest a stub this page mite get beter My Cat inn 19:47, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and Expand. Wikipedia covers a number of hotels and this one seems more important than most. Sarge Baldy 03:37, July 28, 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.