Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gheorghe Țepeș Greuruș


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 07:21, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Gheorghe Țepeș Greuruș

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Let's start by running through the sources - only, for obvious reasons, I'll skip the links to Wikipedia and Commons.


 * A list of teachers from Neamț County; I'm not sure what that's supposed to prove
 * The site and a description of a high school in Gheorgheni; again, I don't know the relevance of this
 * A brochure about a high school in Copșa Mică; likewise
 * Actually, this is getting boring, so I'll skip the stuff that doesn't even mention the subject:, , , , , ,
 * Which leaves us with this, a document in which the subject declares his financial and real estate holdings. Every Romanian government employee, all 1,362,000 of them, has to submit such a form, so that's not exactly evidence of notability.
 * And this, which informs us that the subject was founding president of the Neamț County chapter of the Association of Romanian Scientists (not to be confused with the Romanian Academy). Interesting, but not particularly evidencing any sort of notability: it's a fairly minor organization, and in any event, the information is included on the organization's own site (so doesn't come from an independent source).

When all is said and done, this guy was a factory director and a high school teacher. An interesting career, no doubt, but in no sense worth including in an encyclopedia. - Biruitorul Talk 16:35, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete His work in chemistry was not notable. Nothing to distinguish him from the thousands of others who hold PhDs in chemistry. The one place he might pass is as a writer, but there is no indication his works are notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:43, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:59, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:59, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:59, 6 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. Several publications and several patents are not enough, in the absence of other evidence, to pass WP:PROF. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:40, 9 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.