Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gherasim Rusu-Togan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. joe deckertalk to me 15:37, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Gherasim Rusu-Togan

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Other than a mention in some internet review that is itself unquotable (here) and a quote to one of his books on a slightly more reliable one, and two pompous articles in an obscure subprovincial newspaper, there are no mentionable sources for this article, which looks like a vanity page. Not one review in any Romanian literary magazine, in what the article says were decades of activity. Fails WP:AUTHOR, surely. Dahn (talk) 08:22, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  —Dahn (talk) 08:28, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions.  —Dahn (talk) 08:28, 11 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - I'm not really seeing the "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" mandated by WP:GNG; the subject seems to be of decidedly peripheral importance. Should his purported membership in the Writers' Union be raised as an indicator of notability, I'd just like to point out that it has been noted that membership is no big deal, and no substantive factor toward a writer's notability. - Biruitorul Talk 15:32, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete don't think he is notable at all. Nergaal (talk) 02:36, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.