Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghey

Pointless neologism with with unrelated "see also". Not even the "Urban Dictionary" can agree on a meaning. Delete. Lupo 14:28, 14 Jul 2004 (UTC)


 * Relevant:, as well as (from the creator of that thread):
 * the point of my posting was not to re-hash these familiar facts, but to observe the innovative *spellings* "ghey" and "ghay" for the new sense, which i don't believe had been recorded here before (though they may be old hat to the lexicographers among us)
 * [[User:Poccil|Peter O. (Talk)]] 19:02, Jul 14, 2004 (UTC)


 * Delete. Rick'''K 21:53, Jul 14, 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep or redirect somewhere. I see it used all the time. And Lupo, Urban Dictionary never agrees on a definition so that's kind of irrelevant. --Tothebarricades.tk 02:58, 15 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * Just because something is "seen used all the time" doesn't make it worth an article. There are lots of articles deleted because they're nothing more than dictdefs.  Rick'''K 05:41, Jul 15, 2004 (UTC)
 * True; just redirecting to Internet slang would be the best idea, I think...--Tothebarricades.tk 12:17, 15 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * Redirect to internet slang. Johnleemk | Talk 13:06, 15 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * Purely a graphical word, so redirect to internet slang is the only logical course, if the term is in widespread use. Geogre 19:41, 15 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Geogre is right on here. Jeeves 22:18, 15 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * A disgruntled troll recently described this site as "uberghey." How quaint.  Uber-delete. - Lucky 6.9 00:53, 17 Jul 2004 (UTC)