Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghodawat


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 18:40, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

Ghodawat

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Does not appear meet WP:GEOLAND and has no WP:SIGCOV. – Meena • 18:55, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Rajasthan.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:58, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep seems to be legally recognized in the sense of having census data per WP:GEOLAND.  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 08:15, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. Terrible article, but does appear to be a recognised settlement, so meets WP:GEOLAND. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:33, 6 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.