Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghoganwali


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Phalia. Merge and redirect to Phalia (non-admin closure) -- Cheers, Riley Huntley (public)  talk   00:16, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Ghoganwali

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I cannot find any evidence that this place exists. While all human habitations are default notable, we need at least 1 reference (even a set of coordinates in an almanac) to verify that this is a stand-alone unit, not either 1) something made up or 2) just a local name without official status (like many neighborhoods in the US, which must meet GNG). Qwyrxian (talk) 02:44, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:54, 26 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Phalia. From these sources I find that at least this article is not a hoax and this place do exists, but neither of these sources are acceptable for inclusion in the article. Since there is no policy/guideline that suggests deletion in this case, I think its better to redirect it to its larger subdivision. -- S M S   Talk 17:15, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect: as per SMS. Verified but non-notable subdivision of an inhabited place. (The actual content of the article, other than the statement the this place exists, is perhaps suspect.) הסרפד (Hasirpad) [formerly Ratz...bo] 16:24, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.