Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghost (IRC)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 19:49, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Ghost (IRC)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

there seems to be no possible way that this will ever be a notable topic, with third party reliable sources, worthy of its own article on wikipedia. Theserialcomma (talk) 02:40, 27 March 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Existence of the concept is undisputed ( 1 2 3 4 ) so verifiability is not the issue, but notability is. In this case, and with the disclaimer that I know nothing about IRC, even a mention in our encyclopedic article on IRC seems undue. Amalthea  11:41, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

Merge per tag on page. Might be able to sustain itself with in the requested merge article, if not, we can delete it. Buggie111 (talk) 00:36, 3 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Merge and/or redirect to appropriate target. Concept is real, but not enough material to sustain a seperate article.  The information is better served in a larger, omnibus article on IRC.  -- Jayron  32  04:38, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. A trivial thing. It occurs but so what. Lots of trivial things occur in this world. Szzuk (talk) 19:42, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. No need for a separate article on each aspect of IRC. --Nuujinn (talk) 22:01, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.