Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghost Gaunlets


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. --Angr (t·c) 18:36, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

Ghost Gaunlets
Fancruft at its worst. Redirecting is pointless, as nobody should be expected to enter this in. --Apostrophe
 * Merge and redirect. -- JJay 21:34, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge to what? --Apostrophe 03:35, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
 * One of the pages associated with the show, otherwise keep article as is. -- JJay 04:01, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Why? It's a fictional invention that serves as a quick plot device and only appears for the best of fifteen seconds. Why, exactly, should Wikipedia even dedicate server space to this? --Apostrophe 04:26, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Why not? People watch the show and obviously cared enough to want to share Ghost Gaunlets with the world. I'm not going to tell those people that they are stupid. I am also not qualified to judge how Ghost Gaunlets fits within the Danny Phantom oeuvre. Therefore, I prefer to follow my instincts and err on the side of caution. Plus this debate will probably take up more server space than the article. -- JJay 04:38, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Alas, life is not a caring matron. Nor is Wikipedia, as evidenced by countless deletions of not notable band articles. (Or are you to argue that we should coodle those people for being ever so kind enough to let us be aware of their worthless bands or geekish knowledge of the obscure?) I am well-qualified at determining the place of "Ghost Gaunlets", though. It only appears for fifteen seconds in "The Ultimate Enemy". Period. --Apostrophe 04:49, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
 * I do not doubt for one second your Danny Phantom qualifications and expertise regarding The Ultimate Enemy, which would probably be an excellent final resting place for Ghost Gaunlets. Think of how much time would have been saved, though, had you pursued that course, a merge and redirect, rather than AfD. We have now discussed the issue far longer than the entire lifespan of said Ghost Gaunlets, a fact that I find somewhat ironic. In any case, the issue is now out of our hands, as it will be decided by future voters, some of whom may be members of worthless bands or devotees of geekishly obscure knowledge. Furthermore, I do not believe we should coodle any of life's uncaring matrons, just the really nice ones who greet you with a warm cup of tea when they invite you in for a spot of Danny Phantom -- JJay 05:52, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, nn. -Sean Curtin 06:50, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Relisting for further discussion BD2412  T 05:11, 21 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete lacks notability--MONGO 05:47, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete and hope no ghost gauntlets will bring it back from the dead. Flyboy Will 08:02, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge and Redirect as per JJay Jcuk 20:03, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete vacuous fancruft Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 23:22, 21 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.