Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghost Light (band)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. RL0919 (talk) 19:15, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

Ghost Light (band)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable musical band that lack in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them. A before i conducted shows no evidence of true notability as they are merely discussed in passing when they release new music. Each member of the band fail WP:GNG & WP:BASIC. Celestina007 (talk) 18:28, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 18:28, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 18:28, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 18:28, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 18:28, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 19:03, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Since the AfD notice, I've added more references and expanded the article. Also note that 2 members of the band have existing pages. Jfricker (talk) 21:21, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
 * keep Nom appears to have missed the fact that two established musicians are in this band. Beyond that, the album and shows have been reviewed,and the band - its formation, members - has gotten reported coverage, some of which I just added to the page.IceFishing (talk) 12:55, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep as has reliable sources coverage that has been added to the article such as Dallas Observer, PopMatters and Mint newspaper so therefore pass WP:GNG and deserve to be included, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 23:56, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per and . — Hunter Kahn 02:26, 26 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.