Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghost Mine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. Johnleemk | Talk 10:47, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

Ghost Mine
Non-notable invention. Google of "ghost mine" and "pyrotechnic" has whopping 8 hits, not all related to this. ? vanity, ? ad... Either way, delete. Ifnord 19:59, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

'''Relisting debate in hopes of generating some form of consensus. Please place new discussion below this line.''' → Ξxtreme Unction {yak ł blah } 17:01, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep: It is an informative little article which explains What, Who, Where, Why, and How. Hu 04:32, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
 * ... but omits the all-important whence. Uncle G 04:24, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I actutally did find one site that mentions "ghost mine" in what might be this sense, but that doesn't establish its notability. --  Dalbury ( Talk )  14:18, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete.Gateman1997 21:50, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak keep, eh? Needs to be verified though. Stifle 23:19, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment Have you tried to? It does no good to say keep something and then leave it to others to try to find credible sources. --  Dalbury ( Talk )  00:07, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep per Uncle G Hu. -- JJay 20:27, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
 * I am fairly certain that Uncle G isn't voting "keep", since he points out that the article in question lacks verifiability. → Ξxtreme Unction {yak ł blah } 20:40, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
 * delete per nom └UkPaolo/TALK┐ 08:50, 15 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.