Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghost Mine (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  23:26, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Ghost Mine
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Kept at AfD in 2005 when our standards were "idk i bet its real". No indication this is a notable special effect or device. Sole source is a how-to and I was not able to find any significant independent coverage on a search. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 23:28, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 23:28, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Light merge or redirect to pyrotechnic as WP:ATD &mdash;siro&chi;o 02:57, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
 * On further thought, then it would need to be a disambiguation, given Ghost Mine (TV series) &mdash;siro&chi;o 02:59, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
 * We can't merge unverified content, and I didn't find any independent sourcing to verify this. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 03:19, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
 * It's probably a common enough term for a minimal merge, redirect, or dabmention, I think. Though doesn't meet N on its own. Eg here's how the US state of Oregon defines them &mdash;siro&chi;o 03:33, 4 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete, basically an extended DICDEF. And wow AfD from 2005, trippy... Who what when where and why eh? Sure, it's notable... Oaktree b (talk) 23:49, 4 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete. I think I'd really enjoy shooting one of these off however that's not grounds for notability.
 * -- A. B. (talk • contribs • global count) 03:32, 5 September 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.