Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghost Soldier of Green Park


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. § FreeRangeFrog croak 22:49, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Ghost Soldier of Green Park

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

There are really no reliable sources to prove that the ghost exists. Vanjagenije (talk) 17:36, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:12, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:12, 26 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. We don't have to prove existence, just notability. I honestly can't find anything out there that shows that this specific specter has been the focus of in-depth coverage in reliable sources. Of the sources on the article, two of them aren't actually about this specific ghost and were actually about some of the other ghosts mentioned in passing. The only one left is a book source that is completely unsearchable and I'm somewhat forced to also assume that the book doesn't mention this ghost either and is also about the other ghosts that were mentioned in the article. I couldn't really find anything in general about this specific male soldier. The most I could find are extremely generalized statements about ghosts in general that were seen in the park, but nothing that would count towards notability. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   04:26, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Subject seems to fail WP:FRINGE. -Ad Orientem (talk) 01:42, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.