Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghost Son


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Electric  Burst (Electron firings)(Zaps) 17:12, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Ghost Son

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Nominating for deletion as a page created by User:Mr. Lama, a confirmed sockpuppet of User:Giovannigiulio. Electric Burst (Electron firings)(Zaps) 21:05, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. clpo13(talk) 23:17, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. clpo13(talk) 23:17, 31 January 2016 (UTC)


 * type:
 * year:
 * director:
 * star:
 * star:


 * Keep per meeting WP:NF no matter who brought us the topic two years ago. And as this was authored one year before the sockmaster and puppet were blocked, it is not the issue. What is the deciding factor is that this had wide release and multiple reviews over multiple countries over several years and available Non-English coverage shows notability. What serves the project is improvement through regular editing, not deletion.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 01:12, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep and warn the nominator as they are mass-nominating/prodding all the articles of Mr. Lama, regardless of when they were created, regardless of who else edited them, regardless of their notability and even regardless of their actual sourcing. If Mr. Lama/Giovannigiulio was ever disruptive, nomitator is being disruptive as well, possibly more. In a case like this, G5 is clearly not eligible, notability is obvious, there is no improvement for the encyclopedia from the deletion of the article, and AfD like these are just a big waste of time for the community, who has better things to do. Cavarrone 05:45, 1 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.