Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghost ancient city


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 03:33, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Ghost ancient city

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Book with no indication of notability, couldn't pull up anything on a Google search, this maybe completely false or a WP:HOAX as far as I can tell. -War wizard90 (talk) 03:49, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. I don't think it's a hoax, but rather something published in another language. This looks like it was written by someone who is struggling with English (ie, not their first language, which is probably Ukranian considering that many of their articles are Ukraine related) and at times it somewhat comes across like it was run through Google Translate. I'd tag this as a speedy for promotion, but this isn't as bad as it could otherwise be. Barring someone from WP:UKRAINE finding sources in another language, I don't think that this work is particularly noteworthy. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   06:49, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete: a poor translation of article Марево давнього Львова at the Ukrainian Wikipedia, about a book about the history of Lviv. Note article Lviv through the ages by the same editor, which corresponds to the Ukrainian article Львів крізь віки, another book on the same subject. הסרפד  (call me Hasirpad) 21:47, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions.  הסרפד  (call me Hasirpad) 22:51, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  הסרפד  (call me Hasirpad) 22:51, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions.  הסרפד  (call me Hasirpad) 22:51, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Comment: Марево давнього Львова contains two sources that might provide substantial coverage about the book:ВИЗНАЧЕНО ПЕРЕМОЖЦЯ ЧЕРГОВОГО ЕТАПУ КОНКУРСУ РЕЦЕНЗІЙWebCiteЛьвів на книжкових полицяхWebCite I cannot read the sources. But would someone who can read the sources look into whether they are reliable and provide significant coverage about the book? Cunard (talk) 00:33, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete unless someone presents reliable sources that indicate that the book is notable.  SchreiberBike | ⌨  06:13, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 06:57, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.