Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghostemane


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. The Bushranger One ping only 01:06, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Ghostemane

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable musician. All the sourcing available is either primary sourcing or not credible reliable independent sourcing, thus failing the general guideline found in WP:N. No evidence of meeting WP:NMUSIC either. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:53, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  06:05, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  06:05, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  06:05, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:05, 26 October 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak delete. Some coverage exists but unless anyone can add to this, I don't think there's enough to establish notability. --Michig (talk) 06:14, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:36, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. I could not find sources better than the ones cited above; perhaps WP:TOOSOON to meet WP:MUSICBIO.  gongshow  talk  17:42, 8 November 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.