Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghostly Talk


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus. W.marsh 04:37, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Ghostly Talk

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Nonnotable podcast; doesn't identify hosts' full names, or give independent sources showing notability. Disputed speedy. NawlinWiki 19:49, 9 April 2007 (UTC)


 * KEEP Added article today - deleted while editing the article. Not a podcast only. The show is notable for its guest appearances including one of the few with George Lutz of Amityville Horror. Show noted for its Brian Jones project where communication over the air in real time with "spirits" was attempted with voices coming through. Show noteworthy enough for inclusion on Coast to Coast AM for interview on the shows hosts investigations into EVP among other subjects. Show hosts are also investigators in the same light as Ghost Hunters, reality television. An article is NEVER FINISHED and always open for improvement here at Wikipedia. Editor above refused discussion which was opened on the talk page as to his/her objections - where I was open for deletion if point could be made to me that based on the above this is not worthy of inclusion in light of other inclusions of paranormal radio here at Wikipedia. All the above objections should be dealt with in a civil manner with myself as creator of the article; but this was not done. Now I'm here instead of improving the article and moving on to others. Another article of the same dimension would be this: WPARanormal; personally I do not see the difference with the NOTABLE exception of the Brian Jones interview and being noteworthy enough for inclusion in Art Bell's Coast to Coast AM. Also on list here are Wikipedia List of paranormal radio shows. --Northmeister 20:08, 9 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep. Seems to have been rapidly speedy'd duriing it's creation, instead of use of the talk page. Even now, one editor seems to be putting a lot of effort into this. To delete this article, which has a level of substance, while it's being built, instead of using the talk page to bring up flaws and guide him, looking like a lack of cooperative spirit. ThuranX 22:47, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep perhaps the edit history accidently wasn't checked, to distinguish it from a stub. I'll AGFDGG 05:01, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'm not seeing the slightest shred of actual notability or important media coverage -- the closest is a couple of links to a local paper ("Local News for Northwest Arkansas"). --Calton | Talk 07:43, 10 April 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.