Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghostly Talk (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:09, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Ghostly Talk
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

The notability of this internet talk show was in doubt in the last two AfDs, but now that it is in "indefinite hiatus", the likelihood that we can get this article to be encyclopedic is dubious at best. Self-published websites are our only references and independent notice from people outside the niche-field of paranormal speculation is not forthcoming. ScienceApologist (talk) 22:53, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Although Coast to Coast AM comes close to being a reliable source, at least for the existance of a radio show internet talk show, that is not enough to establish notability. Steve Dufour (talk) 00:05, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:12, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:13, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete for the reasons I gave in the 2nd AfD. Deor (talk) 04:38, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete for lack of in-depth independent coverage in decent sources. - 2/0 (cont.) 04:41, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete The authors claim they have added reliable sources, but all of the six external links point to websites regarding shows that the producers of the show have appeared on - one doesn't even have anything on the page, reading "SCHEDULE TO BE POSTED SOON". The only other source seems to be a very narrowly-aimed newsletter. I hardly think these are reliable sources, as is stated by a major contributor in the second AfD."Hello, we have added reliable sources to the "External links" section of the Ghostly Talk article." he says. Also, I am suspicious that the article was mainly created by people who are associated with the podcast, as words like "we" suggest.  WackyWace  talk to me, people 08:17, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - These guys apparently never even made an impact in the niche pop culture they were catering to. - LuckyLouie (talk) 14:13, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.