Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghosts & the Law


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:05, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Ghosts & the Law

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

article summarizing a single lecture at a university. No sources for its notability  DGG ( talk ) 21:34, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:52, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:52, 4 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. The article provides no basis for notability, and I can find none in my own searches. Pretty much all I can find is an SSRN page for the lecture. TJRC (talk) 00:13, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete – I agree that there are no sources that speak to the notability of the subject matter.  The majority of the sourcing points to the text of the lecture itself. NerudaPoet (talk) 01:22, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Man, who would have guessed that a lecture about ghosts could be so dull? Even if this lecture was notable (no evidence of that) the tone and structure of this article are totally unsuitable for an encyclopedia article. The user that created this may be well-meaning but they need to get into the WP:MOS.  A  Train talk 23:41, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - obscure, fantastic legal theory. Bearian (talk) 21:33, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete – Fails to establish notability with reliable sources. --Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 05:58, 10 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.