Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghulam Mustafa Burdwani


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. The Wordsmith Talk to me 17:54, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Ghulam Mustafa Burdwani

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Historical scholarship does not document our subject except once with the rest of the sources being verbatim quotations. Fails WP:N with no significant level of coverage. Article contains a lot of Original Research. Jaunpurzada (talk) 14:51, 3 January 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 08:48, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bangladesh, India and Islam. Jaunpurzada (talk) 14:51, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * .Delete. Doesn't meet WP:GNG. RomanRaju (talk) 10:16, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

Relisting comment: Relisting as the two participants just registered their accounts and sped here. So, I'd welcome more opinions especially if there is a feasible ATD. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:00, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom does not meet GNG.Tame Rhino (talk) 01:01, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Relisting comment: Final relist. It would be helpful to get an assessment of newly added sources. By the way, this AFD was not set up properly, the article was never tagged with an AFD tag until a bot eventually did. Please review AFD instructions, nominator. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:37, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep He is very old Muslim Scholar, whose names are recorded in the old books of Urdu. Youknowwhoistheman (talk) 15:34, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.