Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gia Primo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Bearcat (talk) 01:30, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Gia Primo

 * – (View AfD)

Notability concerns - lack of significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject. Addhoc (talk) 19:45, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree that this is by no means the best article around the block, but if the claim that the subject appeared in Chicago Fitness Magazine is true, there might be some notability. Excirial ( Talk, Contribs ) 20:08, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Switching to delete. i assumed there might have been some notability (Note: Biased opinion, i gave a hand Wikifying this for a new user), but there isn't. Excirial ( Talk, Contribs ) 21:37, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree that this is by no means the best article around the block, but if the claim that the subject appeared in Chicago Fitness Magazine is true, there might be some notability. Excirial ( Talk, Contribs ) 20:08, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Switching to delete. i assumed there might have been some notability (Note: Biased opinion, i gave a hand Wikifying this for a new user), but there isn't. Excirial ( Talk, Contribs ) 21:37, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Switching to delete. i assumed there might have been some notability (Note: Biased opinion, i gave a hand Wikifying this for a new user), but there isn't. Excirial ( Talk, Contribs ) 21:37, 25 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete I see no such claim that she appeared in Chicago Fitness Magazine, and even if she did, that would not make for an adequate assertion of notability per WP:BIO. DarkAudit (talk) 23:24, 24 February 2008 (UTC)


 * http://www.chicagofitness.net/ is the website and it also has a yearly magazine.It is her official magazine, the reason why it is rarely publsihed . (Connortt9 (talk) 19:16, 25 February 2008 (UTC))
 * Doesn't appear to be a reliable source independent of the subject, therefore isn't relevant in determing notability. Addhoc (talk) 19:17, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
 * So we have two personal sites and a self-published magazine as the sources. Not acceptable sources. DarkAudit (talk) 19:28, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - I see noe reliable sources to establish notability, nor am I able to find them when I conduct my own search. -- Whpq (talk) 21:10, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - It is a bio, has been tagged with CSD several times already. Was also previously deleted several times (see logs). Someone obviously is persisting here, even though it falls under CSD A7. Ejay (talk) 06:29, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Guys, I just found I made a mistake in typing , in the modelling career section , I had written it as "Soon however, she was invited to join the wrestling club of Chicago Fitness Magazine and she obliged." Actually , Chicago Fitness is her offical website and it publishes a magazine once a year. What was the correct sentence was "Soon however, she was invited to join the wrestling club of Chaos Videos and she obliged." I have linked Chaos Videos on the Gia Primo page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Connortt9 (talk • contribs) 09:23, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

The images of Gia where she is posing and the caption is posing for Chicagi Fitness is referring to her website chicagofitness.net(Connortt9 (talk) 09:26, 27 February 2008 (UTC))
 * Delete and salt, no independent sources and no assertion of notability. Kim Dent-Brown   (Talk)  13:14, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Kim, u have'nt been to her website and her myspace accounts for which the links are provided in the Gia Primo article. check them out next time before u start accusing people ! (Connortt9 (talk) 08:23, 28 February 2008 (UTC))
 * As I said, no independent sources. Kim Dent-Brown   (Talk)  08:59, 28 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.