Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giambracy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete as part of a pattern of vandalism. I was about to nominate this myself, when I noticed Sockpuppet investigations/Bh6thman/Archive, Giambigarchy, Giambigarchy 2, and Giambiarchy. Compare Special:Contributions/Giambs0099 and Special:Contributions/Giambs009; and read this edit. This is silly and persistent vandalism, by someone who isn't genuinely attempting to collaborate in writing encyclopaedia articles, plain and simple. I was about to note this on User talk:Fabrictramp. But this AFD nomination appeared as I was writing there. So I'm writing the explanation here instead. &#9786;  To add to that conversation:  There's no need to look for an extension to the criteria. We have criterion #G3 already. Uncle G (talk) 19:40, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Giambracy

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fan club / religious movement with exactly 0 non-wiki ghits and 0 gnews hits. WP:NFT probably applies here. Prod contested by IP user without comment. Fabrictramp |  talk to me  19:23, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  19:24, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Straightforward NFT case. &mdash; RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 19:26, 27 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.