Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gian Piero Ventrone


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Gian Piero Ventrone
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) • Huferpad talk 06:38, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Lack of notability • Huferpad talk 11:46, 8 October 2022 (UTC)


 * I haven't checked yet but I don't think an athletic trainer who was at the best-ever Juventus, at the FIFA World Cup-winning Italy and at Tottenham could lack of notability. Dr Salvus 11:50, 8 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Italy. Shellwood (talk) 11:57, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
 * @Shellwood please categorise it to: Football, Italy, Biography. Dr Salvus 12:05, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:24, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:31, 8 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep - passes WP:GNG easily, no question about it. Even ignoring the sources about his death, here's high-quality sources I found when searching three minutes: The Telegraph, Evening Standard, NY Times, the i, all independent with significant coverage. DatGuyTalkContribs 14:30, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - trainer at major football clubs and a World Cup winning national team suggests notability. Multiple reliable sources in UK and Italy. LenF54 (talk) 14:47, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep per above., please use Twinkle to open an AFD. Dr Salvus</b> 14:50, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep per sources above which show notability. GiantSnowman 20:08, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Has plenty of English-language coverage that now certainly asserts notability. sixty nine   • whaddya want? •  07:19, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep, extremely low effort nomination.--Ortizesp (talk) 08:14, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete he only seems to be notable for dying.Spike &#39;em (talk) 20:33, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
 * As can be seen by the multitude of sources posted above that were written before his death? DatGuyTalkContribs 20:52, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
 * , read the sources mentioned by DatGuy. Not enough for you? Read the news on him from 1 January 2000 to 5 October 2022 (the day before his death) here. <b style="font-family: Verdana; color: #6633FF;">Dr</b> <b style="font-family: Verdana; color: #6633FF;">Salvus</b> 21:05, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep ridiculous nomination with no merit or even attempt at a rationale. Abcmaxx (talk) 22:25, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - odd nomination - article clearly meets GNG with references provided. In addition to the pre-death Italian articles, it's easy to find English-language articles, such as this. Perhaps User:Huferpad can withdraw this? Nfitz (talk) 23:33, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Notice I ask the next person who wants to vote keep to directly close this ridiculous nomination. The AfD also doesn't allow the article to be posted at WP:ITN. <b style="font-family: Verdana; color: #6633FF;">Dr</b> <b style="font-family: Verdana; color: #6633FF;">Salvus</b> 05:08, 11 October 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.