Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gianfranco Zaccai


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I appreciate 's comments; unfortunately, nobody else agreed with them. If you want the article userfied or moved to draft space pending improvement, drop me a line. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  11:05, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Gianfranco Zaccai

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Nonnotable. One Paragraph to write? Wikipedia is not Social Media Light2021 (talk) 05:12, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  Jupitus Smart  06:07, 6 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep per WP:GNG. Has coverage in Boston Globe, WSJ, and other publications Article is stubby and sources not the best quality, but could be improved. --Colapeninsula (talk) 13:35, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Are you reading those or they are coming just from notable media so we should keep these articles for the sake of it. Wikipedia is not Newspaper that every one article coverage about one person should have a place in Wikipedia. Else we will end of creating 100000 pages every day covering on any kind of local to national media discussing of individuals. Clearly that is not what Wikipedia meant for.
 * WSJ: Industrial designer Gianfranco Zaccai is lying in a hospital bed. What is this coverage?
 * bostonglobe : A Press coverage? Thats allLight2021 (talk) 12:36, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
 * What is your point? He meets WP:GNG with in-depth coverage in reliable sources over multiple years. He passes WP:NOTNEWS because of the continuing and in-depth nature of the coverage. Do you have a policy-based reason to assert he is not notable? --Colapeninsula (talk) 13:35, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete -- a directory like listing at best; notability not established. The achievements are not significant enough for an encyclopedia entry. Wikipedia is not LinkedIn. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:35, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:48, 13 July 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:39, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete As per the nomination. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 04:55, 20 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.