Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gianluca Vacchi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:05, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Gianluca Vacchi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I've removed PROD, but opening a discussion. As a businessman he's not quite notable, but his Instagram blog has 6.6 million followers and as a blogger there are quite enough sources in press that may add support for notability claim. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 09:31, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
 * * Delete WP:SOAP probably applies. The page of Gianluca Vacchi on the italian Wikipedia ( https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gianluca_Vacchi ) has been deleted, with consensus, at least 6 times. Currently it is protected to avoid useless re-creation and re-deletion.  ALoopingIcon (talk) 22:58, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Hallo, in my opinion, the page should be kept, he is not relevant as businessman, of course, but he has become famous on social networks and is a sort popular culture icon (whatever the origin of his notability is). I think wiki would do a service informing his readers about him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.204.32.169 (talk) 13:36, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete and WP:SALT per above. Totally run of the mill investor. Bearian (talk) 19:41, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete a non-notable businessman.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:01, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete article is an obvious self-aggrandisement of an individual with no substantive merit. With the possibility of purchasing social media followers and engagement readily available and in common abuse, the substantiation of Instagram followers or other platforms can hold no weight as a barometer of the individual's importance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.14.84.40 (talk) 16:04, 3 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.