Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gianmichael Salvato


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Jclemens (talk) 03:38, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Gianmichael Salvato

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested proposed deletion. Questionable assertions of notability at best. No references whatsoever. I am nominating it as proxy for Kjnelan. {&#123; Nihiltres &#124;talk&#124;edits}&#125; 03:01, 27 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks Nihiltres! This article was originally PRODed on 19:56, 19 July 2009 (UTC) by User:ukexpat after my bringing the page to: Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard/Archive67 since the page carried only Weasel and Peacock and since all attempts at providing appropriate third party cites were fruitless.  It was decided by others that the page should be PRODed.


 * According to the history of the page (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gianmichael_Salvato&action=history) the prod was removed literally moments before deletion by someone, who in the history comment only, claimed I was the one contesting the PROD. For the record, I am not contesting the PROD and am in fact for removing the page.


 * My own personal feeling is that the person who removed the PROD does so on their own randomly (Special:Contributions/Mardaloop) and does so without explanation (as evidenced from their talk page at: User_talk:Mardaloop. This almost appears as if Mardaloop is a...  well...  I'll assume good faith for the moment.


 * The page was available for deletion for seven full days and literally moments before the deletion it was de-proded.


 * I am pro-deletion for Gianmichael Salvato. Thank you for the opportunity to present my case.  Kjnelan (talk) 03:26, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * (Addendum: I am pro-deletion for the following reason(s) (which were also provided for the first discussion, though no discussion resulted): 1.) Non-notable subject, no references and nothing reliable thrown up by Google. 2.) Talk:Gianmichael_Salvato/Comments.)
 * I'd also like to nom the article for "Speedy Deletion" since the user (Mardaloop) who de-PRODed the article has been accused as a Sockpuppet, but I am not sure the criteria has been met or if that is inappropriate at this time. Kjnelan (talk) 16:36, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ( X! ·  talk )  · @037  · 23:53, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

A comment was left at Talk:Gianmichael Salvato regarding this issue. Kjnelan (talk) 02:07, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * and more comments were left here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kjnelan (talk • contribs) 07:33, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

The above comments were removed by User:Nja247 due to legal threats by User_talk:98.235.25.88. Kjnelan (talk) 16:53, 4 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. Wholly unreferenced BLP with a borderline assertion of notability. Lara  03:29, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  22:11, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.