Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giant Lion


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 00:14, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Giant Lion
Delete no assertion of notability. the Talmud is 1000's of pages long. this is one incredibly tiny piece. It's not clear why the author has chosen it for inclusion into wikipedia. I attempted to contact the author for an explanation of significance, but got no answer. Disclosure: I am very familiar with the Talmud and therefore my opinion is well-informed. Crzrussian 12:44, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as nn. --Ter e nce Ong 17:07, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. --Ezeu 18:37, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Jewish mythological characters are valuable and encyclopedic. JRP 06:07, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Even incredibly minor ones? Crzrussian 02:28, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
 * No one is arguing against the fact that "Jewish mythological characters are valuable and encyclopedic." JRP, please read Crzrussian's reasoning and vote accordingly.--Ezeu 02:43, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
 * On further review, I agree. Delete and merge with Divei Ilai. JRP 02:56, 12 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete minor ones aren't. --James 08:21, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - already speedied once before Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 07:52, 13 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.