Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giant anaconda


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 09:06, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

Giant anaconda

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article is based solely on unverified reports of very long snakes. This is by definition a fringe point of view and is not supported by reliable sources. –dlthewave ☎ 04:04, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN MEDUSA   talk  10:39, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Weak delete Does not appear to be well sourced, but am dubious about AFD's shortly after gutting an article.Slatersteven (talk) 15:03, 20 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete: per nominator. Enwebb (talk) 15:10, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete What there is in the way of reliably sourced length estimates is provided at great depth in the description section for the largest species, Green anaconda. That includes quite good coverage of speculations, too. So while this is a topic of perennial interest, we've already got it covered in suitable format. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 15:56, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete due to lack of reliable sources. -Roxy, the PROD. . wooF 16:21, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Unclear why anyone thought this should be a separate article in the first place; anything worth salvaging can go to anaconda or Green_anaconda. Reywas92Talk 20:01, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Green anaconda. Not sure why this needs to have a separate article. Hog Farm (talk) 20:22, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete due to lack of reliable sources. &#58;bloodofox: (talk) 19:18, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Lacking fact-based reliable sources, the topic is pure-fiction. There is a good film about this but in the real everyday world no reliable evidence. Psychologist Guy (talk) 17:05, 24 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.