Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giant bloodworm


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Index of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 1st edition monsters. The merge !votes outweigh the keep/delete !votes. The content that gets merged is at user discretion (should be noted that there is already an entry for this character). (non-admin closure)  Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )  06:11, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Giant bloodworm

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Only primary sources (one) provided; no evidence of non-trivial discussion of this creature in multiple reliable independent verifiable sources. KDS4444 (talk) 01:50, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. — MRD  20  14  01:59, 29 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep or merge to Index of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 1st edition monsters. BOZ (talk) 04:09, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist  (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 04:28, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment/ Response Keep or merge because... Because why?  Because discussion in reliable independent secondary sources??  Or because feels right?  Is curious....  KDS4444 (talk) 09:38, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Because it's policy to do so? Jclemens (talk) 19:38, 30 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Merge Per BOZ. Jclemens (talk) 19:38, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Merge as above. Josh Milburn (talk) 21:14, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Merge the description as per BOZ, since the creature is already on the list.  Onel 5969  TT me 02:10, 7 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.