Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giant in My Heart


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. I think DocTree summarized it well enough, and did the homework. I could relist it, but it seems obvious this will slide by with a keep. Dennis Brown &#124; 2¢ &#124; WER  17:32, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Giant in My Heart

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not clear how this might meet WP:NSONGS. Having only debuted recently, lacking the coverage as the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works, no indication of charting or awards, it appears to be too soon for a dedicated article. Probably should be redirected to the artist's page. RadioFan (talk) 20:17, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  23:02, 13 July 2014 (UTC)


 * comment Please note that I only undid the redirection due to it being turned into a broken redirect, and one entirely to the wrong link; in short, no part of the edit was useful. A Google search turns up plenty of results, and it being featured on "This Week's Fresh Music" is a good indicator. (I am interested to know your rationale for the "failed verification" insertion.) There is no need to add notability to the article - that's this AfD's job. And for heavens' sake notify me! I know I don't appreciate whacking great templates on my talk page but a ping wouldn't've hurt!-- Laun  chba  ller  23:50, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment The number of Google results doesn't tell us much about notability. It's also not clear how "this week in Fresh Music" is a good indicator and that reference could not be verified as I'm unable to locate archives of previous weeks. Let's stick to WP:NSONGS for guidance on whether a dedicated article on this song is necessary or if it would be better covered in the album (is there an album?) or artist's page.--RadioFan (talk) 00:20, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
 * If you live in the UK, it's on now and again on Wednesday. If you put it on now you may be able to catch it. I'm warning you; the captions are changed every week. I will be watching it on Wednesday.-- Laun  chba  ller  08:44, 14 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Strongly oppose deletion, I guarantee if this page is deleted it will have to be recreated in a months time after this song is properly released, it's going to easily go Top 40 and quite possibly Top 10, dont delete just to recreate a few weeks later!
 * Weak Keep based largely on this that was published after the deletion nom. It indicates that the song moved up to 47 on Billboard’s Hot Dance/Electronic Songs and that the associated video was nominated for an MTV Video Music Award. Other Google hits indicate the song isn't due to be "officially released" until August. Many of the Google results aren't in English and I didn't bother using Google translate on them. While I disagree with Guyb123321's WP:CRYSTAL (and please sign your edits here), the song seems to have enough independent coverage now.  Launchballer, please add reliable sources and continue to improve the article.  The Idolator.com review is by a fan, definitely not a WP:RS, and the other two references aren't in-depth coverage.  There's more out there. DocTree (ʞlɐʇ·ʇuoɔ) Join WER 03:31, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.