Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giant pipi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   . moot. Has been speedied by another admin. Fabrictramp |  talk to me  21:27, 9 January 2009 (UTC) 
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedily deleted as a hoax. Elkman (Elkspeak) 21:31, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Giant pipi

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Hoax article. Was nominated for speedy deletion but nomination challenged. Article concerns a giant clam, whose maximum length, according to the article, can be 60 metres. This beast goes by the name of Maximus Plebidonax deltoides. There is a Plebidonax deltoides to be sure, and it is referred to as a pipi, but the gigantic version in this article has no references or sources to verify its existence, despite one of its characteristics being "... killers of fishermen for trophies." The one reference given links to the Encyclopedia Britannica. online edition, but there's no mention of the clam there. No other sources found  FlowerpotmaN &middot;(t) 15:31, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete The first three paragraphs of the article were copied directly from Plebidonax deltoides with all the size adjectives changed to imply monstrousness. Someone was having fun. Rklear (talk) 15:43, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment "Someone was having fun.". Yup, I was thinking of one heck of a bowl of chowder myself :)  FlowerpotmaN &middot;(t) 15:47, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Obvious hoax. Hehe, he said pipi. -Atmoz (talk) 17:03, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Somebody's bored at work. Delete per WP:PENISRELATEDHOAX. If this isn't a current policy, it should be. ;-)  Graymornings (talk) 18:47, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Wait: the pictures did not convince you? OK, delete. Hoax. Though I want this to be true. Drmies (talk) 19:02, 9 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.