Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giant strider


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to List of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 1st edition monsters. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:18, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Giant strider

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article does not establish notability, and it relies only on primary sources. TTN (talk) 08:10, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unless this can pass our fiction tresholds (coverage by mainstream sources), this should be deleted as a poor fork of . That's what wikia and friends are for. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 08:14, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:19, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:19, 27 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep or merge into List of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 1st edition monsters. BOZ (talk) 13:54, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Merge or Delete, according to where consensus is tipping at the end. One thing is sure, with only primary sources the topic fails to establish independent notability per WP:GNG and cannot be kept as a stand-alone.Folken de Fanel (talk) 19:48, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Merge into List of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 1st edition monsters. Web Warlock (talk) 12:21, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
 * no third party sources to establish independent notability. delete or merge. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  03:50, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 1st edition monsters. No real information to salvage other than publications, but that could be added from some of the primary sources. —Torchiest talkedits 04:02, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge per BOZ. Deletion is not a policy-supported outcome per WP:ATD, since a merge target has been identified. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jclemens (talk • contribs)
 * i will note that "keep" is not a policy supported outcome, since no policy has been identified. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  10:50, 3 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Merge into List of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 1st edition monsters. Has not received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Rangoondispenser (talk) 14:58, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.