Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gibraltar Associates


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete JForget  00:27, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Gibraltar Associates

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Speedy contested by original author of the article. A non notable PR firm established this year. Nothing to indicate, and no apparent sources of, how the firm meets WP:ORG. Nuttah68 13:42, 11 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete - Advertising. --DAJF 13:53, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong delete Seems to be spam STORMTRACKER   94  14:01, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - not quite sure if that's blatant advertising - it could probably be edited down, though it's still spammy. That being said, do we have notability? Nihiltres ( t .l ) 14:03, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. While sections of the article are promotional, those could be removed. However, as the nom notes, there is no assertion of notability per WP:CORP. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:55, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. JohnCD 15:52, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete might be notable, might not be. But the present article is unsalvagably an advert... and a poor one at that.  Pretty embarassing all around, but doubly so considering this is supposed to be a PR firm! Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  18:37, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete spam spam spam. Nixdorf 21:19, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete It is an ad, but even if you change that there's no notability yet to justify a page. Alberon 10:33, 12 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.