Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gibsonten


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Jayjg (talk) 02:29, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Gibsonten

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Prodded by me, endorsed by, and removed by author without explanation. Original prod rationale was "an attempt to use WIkipedia to propagate a non-notable/non-existent myth"; endorsement comment by MuffledThud was "Unreferenced, either WP:HOAX or WP:SPAM, can find no coverage online at all, from WP:Reliable sources or otherwise."

Delete as original prodder. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 18:04, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator and WP:CRYSTAL. Armbrust  Talk  Contribs  18:14, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Weird burble about a guitar that does not exist, but might. MuffledThud (talk) 21:49, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Snow Delete: A non-existent guitar. Joe Chill (talk) 22:01, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:08, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per the above. If, as MuffledThud indicates, the guitar is manufactured and becomes notable, then we can revisit this. But, for now, no. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 16:15, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.