Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gievenbach


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 19:31, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Gievenbach

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Very limited refs on the page for many years - just a mention in a government list. Nothing much to suggest a 4km small stream meets the notability criteria on en.wiki JMWt (talk) 13:04, 18 February 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  14:30, 25 February 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star   Mississippi  15:23, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Germany. JMWt (talk) 13:04, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Weak keep again notability is not what is in the article, I've found additional information here and there are a lot of mentions of the stream in a BEFORE search. Since WP:GEOLAND is a low bar - we just need more than statistics - I'm convinced that is out there, especially with simple Google Scholar searches. SportingFlyer  T · C  13:18, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I don't really see how being a habitat for mudsnails makes this stream notable. It doesn't even appear that snails are particularly rare, it is just a place that the scientists found them. JMWt (talk) 14:05, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Please see But_there_must_be_sources! James.folsom (talk) 22:46, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.