Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gig Gangel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. I have given less weight to appeals to inherant notability because BIO remains an overarching guideline that requires sources. There seems to be a dearth of reliable sourcing for this individual and the late addition of a film role has been refuted. The consensus is that this is not securely sourced so the consensus has to be delete under GNG Spartaz Humbug! 20:09, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Gig Gangel

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

After four years we have one playboy primary citation and no independent citations. Fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG,nothing in the text that shows any Notability (people) Off2riorob (talk) 21:38, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Wikipedia traditionally has a page for each Playboy playmate.  This "one stop" source for trivia and statistics is very convenient for tracking trends.
 * Keep. By longstanding precedent, Playmates of the Month are considered notable by that fact alone.  When their articles are very brief they may well be merged, provided that merger can be done without loss of information. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:52, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:53, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:53, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per nom. Being a Playmate of the Month is not notable, she fails notability criteria for GNG and PORNBIO. EuroPride (talk) 18:29, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per my comment at Articles for deletion/Gillian Bonner and elsewhere--Milowent (talk) 22:14, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Being a playmate of the month is not notable. Fails GNG as no secondary sources adress in any real detail. Hipocrite (talk) 15:40, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per the community's new view on playmates as reflected in the amendment to WP:PORNBIO. That consensus ought to be honoured. No separate notability is apparent. --Mkativerata (talk) 22:24, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:ENT and the GNG. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 20:11, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. No longer notable under WP:PORNBIO and nowhere near meeting WP:GNG. Move to weak keep. Milowent seems to have proved notability. Alzarian16 (talk) 14:50, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
 * apparently no one is looking for sources for these playmate articles, because she had a lead movie role I just added to the article.--Milowent (talk) 14:41, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
 * She is given the most minimal mention in the source you provided where it merley lists her name in the credits. I can find nothing substantial about the film she appeared in, which doesn't even have its own Wikipedia article. If the film itself is non-notable then how is having a role in it notable? EuroPride (talk) 14:54, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Just because the film doesn't have a wikipedia article (yet?) doesn't mean its not notable. Apparently the NYTimes film guide feels it worthwhile to include as an entry, and notes she was a playmate.  The fact that a playmate from 1980 does not have a wealth of sourcing immediately available via google is completely unsurprising to me.--Milowent (talk) 14:58, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, I know that. My point was that I could find nothing to assert that this film would pass NOT:FILM if it were to be created. So the film appears to be totally non-notable. EuroPride (talk) 15:29, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.