Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giggle Party


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Jayjg (talk) 02:25, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Giggle Party

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Does not appear to meet the criterion for inclusion for bands as expressed here: WP:BAND.  O liver  T wisted (Talk) (Stuff) 08:25, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak delete—appears, at first glance, to be non-notable. ╟─ Treasury Tag ►  stannator  ─╢ 09:31, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:19, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - There's nothing to establish notability for this band, just some trivial coverage in blogs. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 16:37, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete does not pass WP:BAND... indeed, the article seems to go out of its way to establish non-notability. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  16:56, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'm not finding anything that can be considered significant coverage in independent, reliable sources; does not appear to meet WP:BAND.  Gongshow  Talk 09:12, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.