Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giggleberries


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tone 21:21, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Giggleberries

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Contested prod. Non-notable definition, no sources provided. Only reference that was on point was the Urban Dictionary. GregJackP (talk) 22:39, 13 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete - Fair enough, I can't find any evidence myself that this would be notable enough for inclusion. Truthsort (talk) 23:12, 13 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. Seems like a non-notable neologism. — Rankiri (talk) 00:21, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:03, 15 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete Neologism, Wikipedia is not a dictionary, fails notability guidelines  Chzz  ►  17:44, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.